Next article Search Articles Instructions for authors  Access Statistics | Citation Manager  
REVIEW ARTICLE  

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3286    
    Printed52    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded121    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Click on image for details.

 CON: Pulmonary artery catheter use should be forgone in modern clinical practice

Jose R Navas-Blanco1, Ashwin Vaidyanathan2, Paula Trigo Blanco3, Raj K Modak4
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
2 Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital. Detroit, Michigan, USA
3 Department of Anesthesia, Southern New Hampshire Medical Center. Nashua, New Hampshire, USA
4 Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Divisions of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Critical Care Anesthesiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Correspondence Address:
Jose R Navas-Blanco
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, 1800 NW 10 Avenue (M.820), Miami, FL - 33136
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aca.ACA_126_19

Rights and Permissions

Year : 2021  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 8-11

 
SEARCH
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles

  Article in PDF (553 KB)
Email article
Print Article
Add to My List
The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and its role in the practice of modern medicine remains to be questioned and has experienced a substantial decline in its use in the most recent decades. The complications associated to its use, the lack of consistency of the interpretation provided by the PAC among clinicians, the development of new hemodynamic methods, and the deleterious cost profile associated to the PAC are some of the reasons behind the decrease in its use. Since its introduction into clinical practice, the PAC and the data obtained from its use became paramount in the management of critically ill patients as well as for the high-risk/invasive procedures. Initially, many clinicians were under the impression that regardless the clinical setting, acquiring the information provided by the PAC justified its use, until a growing body of evidence demonstrated its lack of mortality and morbidity improvement, as well as several reports of the presence of difficulties—some of them fatal—during its insertion. The authors present an updated review discussing the futility of the PAC in current clinical practice, the complications associated to its insertion, the lack of mortality benefit in critically ill patients and cardiac surgery, as well as present alternative hemodynamic methods to the PAC.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
 

 

  Sitemap | Feedback | Disclaimer | What's New |  
  © Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
 Online since 5th January, 2008

 

 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 
 
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
  *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 
 REVIEW ARTICLE
 



Jose R Navas-Blanco1, Ashwin Vaidyanathan2, Paula Trigo Blanco3, Raj K Modak4
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
2 Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital. Detroit, Michigan, USA
3 Department of Anesthesia, Southern New Hampshire Medical Center. Nashua, New Hampshire, USA
4 Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Divisions of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Critical Care Anesthesiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Correspondence Address:
Jose R Navas-Blanco
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, 1800 NW 10 Avenue (M.820), Miami, FL - 33136
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aca.ACA_126_19

Rights and Permissions

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and its role in the practice of modern medicine remains to be questioned and has experienced a substantial decline in its use in the most recent decades. The complications associated to its use, the lack of consistency of the interpretation provided by the PAC among clinicians, the development of new hemodynamic methods, and the deleterious cost profile associated to the PAC are some of the reasons behind the decrease in its use. Since its introduction into clinical practice, the PAC and the data obtained from its use became paramount in the management of critically ill patients as well as for the high-risk/invasive procedures. Initially, many clinicians were under the impression that regardless the clinical setting, acquiring the information provided by the PAC justified its use, until a growing body of evidence demonstrated its lack of mortality and morbidity improvement, as well as several reports of the presence of difficulties—some of them fatal—during its insertion. The authors present an updated review discussing the futility of the PAC in current clinical practice, the complications associated to its insertion, the lack of mortality benefit in critically ill patients and cardiac surgery, as well as present alternative hemodynamic methods to the PAC.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article  

  Sitemap | Feedback | Disclaimer | What's New |  
  © Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
 Online since 5th January, 2008