ACA App
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
Users online: 1875 Small font size Default font size Increase font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
     
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2634    
    Printed58    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded271    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 65-69
Comparison of effectiveness of tranexamic acid and epsilon-amino-caproic-acid in decreasing postoperative bleeding in off-pump CABG surgeries: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study


Department of Anaesthesia, Apollo Hospital, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission18-Jul-2018
Date of Decision24-Nov-2018
Date of Acceptance07-Jan-2019
Date of Web Publication07-Jan-2020
 

   Abstract 


Context: Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries have been shown to have increased fibrinolysis due to tissue plasminogen activator release. There are no trials comparing the two available antifibrinolytics (tranexemic acid and epsilon-amino-caproic acid) in off-pump CABG surgeries. Aims: The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of tranexamic acid and epsilon-amino-caproic acid with respect to postoperative bleeding at 4 and 24 hours as the primary outcome, and rate of postoperative transfusion, re-operations, complication rate, serum fibrinogen, and D-dimer levels as secondary outcomes. Settings and Design: The study was carried out at a tertiary-level hospital between June 2017 and June 2018. It was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Materials and Methods: Eighty patients undergoing off-pump CABG, were randomly allocated to receive tranexamic acid or epsilon-amino-caproic acid. The patients were followed up in the postoperative period and were assessed for primary and secondary outcomes. Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Nonparametric data were expressed as median with interquartile range and compared using Mann–Whitney U-test, parametric data was represented as mean with standard deviation and analyzed using Student's t-test. Nominal data were analyzed using Chi-square test. Results: Bleeding at 4 hours did not show significant difference between groups, 180 ml (80–250) vs 200 ml (100–310). Bleeding at 24 hours was significantly lesser in tranexamic acid group as compared to epsilon-amino-caproic acid group, 350 ml (130–520) vs 430 ml (160–730) (P = 0.0022) The rate of transfusion, re-operations, seizures, renal dysfunction, fibrinogen levels, and D-dimer levels did not show significant difference between the groups. Conclusions: Tranexamic acid significantly reduced postoperative bleeding in off-pump CABG at 24 hours as compared to epsilon-amino-caproic-acid.

Keywords: Epsilon-amino-caproic acid, off-pump CABG, tranexamic acid

How to cite this article:
Verma S, Srinivas U, Sathpathy AK, Mittal P. Comparison of effectiveness of tranexamic acid and epsilon-amino-caproic-acid in decreasing postoperative bleeding in off-pump CABG surgeries: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Ann Card Anaesth 2020;23:65-9

How to cite this URL:
Verma S, Srinivas U, Sathpathy AK, Mittal P. Comparison of effectiveness of tranexamic acid and epsilon-amino-caproic-acid in decreasing postoperative bleeding in off-pump CABG surgeries: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Ann Card Anaesth [serial online] 2020 [cited 2023 Jan 27];23:65-9. Available from: https://www.annals.in/text.asp?2020/23/1/65/275287





   Introduction Top


Perioperative bleeding has been the greatest complication in cardiac surgery for decades. The institution of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has had the central role in complement activation, platelet activation, and hyperfibrinolysis that commonly contribute to bleeding in on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Since its advent, off-pump CABG (OPCAB) has been shown to be devoid of CPB-induced coagulopathy. However, increased levels of biomarkers that are indicative of systemic activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis have been found that imply the association of some degree of defective haemostasis.[1],[2],[3]

Tranexemic acid (TA) is a synthetic antifibrinolytic that blocks lysine binding site on plasminogen molecule, thus inhibiting the interaction with plasmin and fibrin. It has been extensively evaluated for antifibrinolytic role in on-pump as well as off-pump CABGs. It has resulted in significant decrease in postsurgical bleeding in both scenarios.[4],[5]

Epsilon-amino-caproic acid (EACA) is a synthetic lysine analog that works on the same mechanism as TA. It reduces the rate of plasmin formation and further decreases degradation of fibrin to fibrin degradation products.[6] It also exerts platelet sparing effect by inhibiting plasmin-mediated platelet injury.[7]

OPCAB surgery may result in lesser rate of complications and postsurgical bleeding,[8] nevertheless there are concerns that it results in increased fibrinolysis as a result of release of tissue plasminogen activator from damaged endothelium.[9] Hence, antifibrinolytics have a significant role in minimizing postoperative bleeding in OPCAB.

Since the safety concerns and massive cost burden of aprotinin have appeared in the BART trial,[10],[11] there has been an increased interest in the use of antifibrinolytics in cardiac surgeries.

Both TA and EACA have been shown to reduce bleeding associated with cardiopulmonary bypass.[4],[5] Role of TA in decreasing bleeding in OPCAB surgeries is also evaluated.[3] Studies demonstrating topical use of EACA in OPCAB surgery have documented positive outcome in reducing postoperative hemorrhage.[12] However, the literature regarding its systemic use in OPCAB is sparse. There are no large trials comparing the effectiveness of both drugs in OPCAB surgeries.

The present study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness of both drugs in reducing postsurgical bleeding in off-pump CABG surgeries with respect to blood loss at 4 hours and 24 hours as the primary outcome and rate of transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets, re-exploration rates, postoperative D-dimer, and fibrinogen levels as secondary outcomes.


   Materials and Methods Top


Eighty patients who were admitted for elective CABG by off-pump technique, belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologist category I or II, were enrolled for the study after the approval of Institutional Ethical committee, between June 2017 and June 2018. Patients with concomitant valvular heart disease, recent myocardial infarction (MI <4 weeks ago), ejection fraction <40%, pre-existing neurological, pulmonary, renal or hepatic dysfunction, and known allergy to study drugs were excluded. Oral antiplatelets were stopped 5 days prior and patients were put on low molecular weight heparin, which was withheld 12 hours before surgery. Written informed consent was taken from all the patients. Four patients were excluded as they did not meet the criteria (2 patients required cardiopulmonary bypass owing to hemodynamic collapse after induction and 2 other patients developed acute MI, hence the surgery was postponed). Remaining 76 patients were randomly allocated to Group TA (Tranexamic acid group, n = 38) and Group EA (Epsilon-amino-caproic acid group, n = 38) [Figure 1]. Randomization was done with sealed envelopes and group allocation was done by random drawing of these envelopes by the patients. The envelopes contained designated group label. Drugs were prepared by an anesthetist who was not involved in the study. The preloaded infusions bearing a label of specific infusion rate were handed over by the anesthetist to one of the authors, who administered the study drugs according to the study protocol.
Figure 1: Randomization, group allocation and assessment of the patients

Click here to view


For induction of anesthesia, a standard cardiac induction protocol [13] was followed including fentanyl, midazolam, and rocuronium for induction and sevoflurane with oxygen-air mixture for maintenance. Myocardial stabilization was aided with the help of Octopus stabilizer with negative suction arms. Internal mammary with either a radial artery or a saphenous vein or both were harvested for all cases. Heparin was administered in a dose of 2 mg/kg IV to a target activated clotting time (ACT) of >300 seconds. Group TA received tenexemic acid at a dose of 10 mg/kg IV at induction over 20 min and 1 mg kg -1 h -1 thereafter throughout the surgery. Group EA received amino-caproic acid in dose of 100 mg/kg IV over 20 min, followed by 10 mg kg -1 h -1 through the completion of surgery. Previous studies have reported both weight-based and fixed-dose regimen for TA and EACA,[10],[14] however, a weight-based dosing regimen was opted for in the present study for the purpose of standardization.[7] Protamine was administered as 1 mg per mg of heparin dose.

After the surgery patients were shifted to ICU following standard protocol. Blood loss was analyzed at 4 and 24 hours after shifting. Packed cell transfusion was given if hemoglobin <8 g%. FFP was transfused if specific factor deficiency was documented or postoperative drain output >250 ml/h in the first hour. Platelet transfusion was indicated if platelet count <50000/mm -3. Postoperative fibrinogen levels and D-dimer levels were also analyzed at 4 and 24 hours. Surgical re-exploration was considered if bleeding >300 ml/h in the first 2 hours, or if >200 ml/h for 4 consecutive hours, with normal coagulation data. Patients were observed for postoperative complications (MI, stroke, DVT, PE, renal dysfunction, and seizures) for 48 hours after shifting to the ICU. Seizure was defined as altered sensorium with uprolling of eyes, with or without tonic clonic movements of one or more extremities, renal dysfunction was described as doubling of serum creatinine from the baseline value at 24 hours. Thromboprophylactic measures were started on the first postoperative day in the form of aspirin 100 mg/d and low molecular weight heparin (weight-adjusted dose).

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) Assuming a difference of 420 ml in the postoperative blood loss at 24 hours between the control group and tenexemic acid group, and a standard deviation (SD) of 106 ml (pooled SD of 120 and 90 ml) between the groups, based on a previous study,[11] a sample size of 32 was found sufficient for each group, at a significance level of 5% and study power of 80%. Assuming a dropout rate of 10%, a total of 80 patients were enrolled. Nonparametric data was represented as median with interquartile range and analyzed using Mann–Whitney U-test. Categorical data was represented as mean with standard deviation and was analyzed using Student's t-test. Nominal data was analyzed using Chi-square tests. value <0.05 was considered significant.

Both groups were comparable with respect to demographic variables (age, weight, height, and male: female ratio) [Table 1]. Bleeding at 4 hours did not show any significant difference between the groups, however, bleeding at 24 hours was significantly lesser in group TA compared to group EA (P = 0.0022) [Table 2]. Two patients in TA group and three patients in EA group required PRBC transfusion (P > 0.05). One patient in each group required FFP transfusion (P > 0.05). None of the patients in either group required platelet transfusion. Transfusion rate was nonsignificant between the groups. None of the cases had re-exploration due to excessive bleeding. There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative thromboembolic events (i.e., MI, Stroke, DVT, PE) (P > 0.05). One patient in TA group had an episode of seizure and one patient in EA group had renal dysfunction postoperatively [Table 3]. D-dimer levels were comparatively lesser at all time points in group TA compared to EA but did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) [Figure 2]. Serum levels of fibrinogen were fairly preserved in both groups with no significant difference (P > 0.05) [Figure 3].
Table 1: Baseline demographics

Click here to view
Table 2: Comparison of primary and secondary outcomes

Click here to view
Table 3: Comparison of postoperative complications between groups

Click here to view
Figure 2: Levels of D-dimer. Median D-dimer level between groups. Mann–Whitney U-test was used for comparison, P = 0.0734

Click here to view
Figure 3: Levels of fibrinogen. Mean fibrinogen levels between groups. Data represented as mean ± standard deviation. Student's t-test was used for comparison. No significant difference was found between groups (P = 0.096)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


OPCAB surgeries have shown to be associated with lesser postoperative bleeding compared to conventional CABG by surpassing cardiopulmonary bypass altogether.[15],[16] Despite this, the crude evidence of increased fibrinolysis and increased concentration of inflammatory mediators has urged researchers to investigate the probable role of antifibrinolytics in OPCAB surgeries.[17] Likewise in the present study, the effectiveness of both antifibrinolytic agents (TA and EACA) in decreasing postoperative blood loss in off-pump CABG was compared.

There was no significant difference in the amount of postoperative bleeding at 4 hours between the groups, however, at 24 hours, group TA showed significantly less bleeding compared to group EA. Similar findings were obtained by Karski et al.[18] in a study comparing TA and aminocaproic acid with placebo. This also could be the result of the fact that TA is ten times more potent than aminocaproic acid.[19]

The study showed no significant difference in the rate of postoperative transfusion of PRBC, FFP, or platelets or the rate of reopening operations for excessive bleeding. Chauhan et al.[11] and Falana et al.[14] have demonstrated similar results in their respective studies comparing the two drugs. Martin et al. also reported that both drugs similarly decreased transfusion requirement in pediatric population undergoing cardiac surgeries.[20] It is known that intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion after CABG is associated with increased long-term mortality.[21] Thus, it can be inferred that both drugs have a positive role in decreasing transfusion rates in OPCAB surgeries.

Further, there was no difference in the rate of thromboembolic complications (MI, stroke, DVT, or PE) found between the two groups. The incidence of stroke and DVT that occurred were not statistically significant. Hardy et al. also demonstrated no significant difference in the rate of thromboembolic events in their study comparing the two drugs.[22] Hence, it can be elucidated based on the present study that neither of the antifibrinolytics led to an additional risk of thrombosis, and thus can potentially become a standard of care for blood conservation in OPCAB surgeries.

No increased incidence of renal dysfunction was reported in the present study with either of the drugs. Although EACA has been associated with significant risk of renal dysfunction,[23],[24] the rate in the present study did not reach level of significance. The dose variation and low sample size of the study could have led to such a difference in the outcome.

There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to incidence of seizures. This was in accordance with the findings of a previous study by Makhija et al.[23] In earlier studies, TA has been known to be associated with postoperative seizures.[24],[25] The mechanism involved is thought to be inhibition of gamma-amino-butyric acid neurons. Nevertheless, the present study did not report additional risk of seizures which could have been due to a lower dose of TA employed in the present study.

Levels of fibrinogen were fairly preserved at all time points in both the groups, which implies adequate plasminogen binding. Similar results were found in a study by Chauhan et al.[11] In addition, both groups showed low levels of FDP with no significant difference, indicating effective inhibition of fibrinolysis. Same findings were reported in a prior study.[22]

Thus, based on the results of the present study it can be stated that both TA and EACA are effective inhibitors of fibrinolysis associated bleeding in OPCAB surgeries, however, TA was slightly better with respect to significant reduction in post-operative bleeding at 24 hours.

Lack of standardized, surgery-specific dosing of both agents could be listed as the biggest drawback of this study. Differences in the results of the reported literature could have been subject to the variegated dosing regimen adopted by researchers. Second, timing of the drug administration also requires standardization. Third, the sample size was comparatively smaller to precisely determine the difference in complication rates. Larger trials are warranted in off-pump CABG surgeries to further substantiate the findings of the present study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Paparella D, Galeone A, Venneri MT, Coviello M, Scrascia G, Marraudino N, et al. Activation of the coagulation system during coronary artery bypass grafting operation: Comparison between on pump and off pump techniques. J Thorac Cardiovas Surg 2006;131:290-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Parolari A, Mussoni L, Frigerio M, Naliato M, Alamanni F, Galanti A, et al. Increased prothrombotic state lasting as long as one month after on-pump and off-pump coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:303-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Paparella D, Semeraro F, Scrascia G, Galeone A, Ammollo CT, Kounakis G, et al. Coagulation-fibrinolysis changes during off-pump bypass: Effect of two heparin doses. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:421-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mehr-Aein A, Sadeghi M, Madani-civi M. Does tranexamic acid reduce blood loss in off-pump coronary artery bypass? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2009;15:285-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Greilich PE, Jessen ME, Satyanarayana N, Whitten CW, Nuttall GA, Beckham JM et al. The effect of epsilon-aminocaproic acid and aprotinin on fibrinolysis and blood loss in patients undergoing primary, isolated coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, noninferiority trial. Anesth Analg 2009;109:15-24.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sterns LP, Lillehei CW. Effect of epsilon aminocaproic acid upon blood loss following open-heart surgery: An analysis of 340 patients. Can J Surg 1967;10:304-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Slaughter TF, Faghih F, Greenberg CS, Leslie JB, Sladen RN. The effects of epsilon-aminocaproic acid on fibrinolysis and thrombin generation during cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1997;85:1221-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Nader ND, Khadra WZ, Reich NT, Bacon DR, Salerno TA, Panos AL. Blood product use in cardiac revascularization: Comparison of on- and off-pump techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1640-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Dunn CJ, Goa KI. Tranexamic acid: A review of its use in surgery and other indications. Drugs 1999;57:1005-32.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Fergusson DA, Hébert PC, Mazer CD, Fremes S, MacAdams C, Murkin JM, et al. A  Comparison of aprotinin and lysine analogs in high-risk cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2319-31.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Chauhan S, Gharde P, Bisoi A, Kale S, Kiran U. A Comparison of aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid in adult cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2004;7:40-3.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
12.
Hosseini H, Rahimianfar AA, Abdollahi MH, Moshtaghiyoon MH, Haddadzadeh M, Fekri A, et al. Evaluations of topical application of tranexamic acid on post-operative blood loss in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Saudi J Anaesth 2014;8:224-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Reich DL, Kaplan JA. Cardiovascular pharmacology. In: Kaplan JA, editor. Cardiac Anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2016. p. 321-58.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Falana O, Patel G. Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid versus aminocaproic acid in cardiovascular surgery. Ann Pharmacother 2014;48:1563-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Wei M, Jian K, Guo Z, Wang L, Jiang D, Zhang L. Tranexamic acid reduces postoperative bleeding in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Scand Cardiovasc J 2006;40:105-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Abu-Omar Y, Taggart DP. The present status of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;36:312-21.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Mariani MA, Gu YJ, Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, van Oeveren W, Ebels T. Procoagulant activity after off-pump coronary operation: Is the current anticoagulation adequate? Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1370-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Karski JM, Teasolale SJ, Norma PH, Prevention of post bypass bleeding with tranexamic acid and epsilon aminocaproic acid. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1993;7:431-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Dhir A. Antifibrinolytics in cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anesth 2013;16:117-25.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Martin K, Breuer T, Gertler R, Hapfelmeier A, Schreiber C, Lange R et al. Tranexamic acid versus ɛ-aminocaproic acid: Efficacy and safety in paediatric cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;39:892-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Engoren MC, Habib RH, Zacharias A, Schwann TA, Riordan CJ, Durham SJ. Effect of blood transfusion on long-term survival after cardiac operation. Ann Thorac Sure 2002;74:1180-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Hardy JF, Belisle S, Dupont C, Harel F, Robitaille D, Roy M. Prophylactic tranexemic acid andepsilon aminocaproic acid for primary myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:371-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Makhija N, Sarupria A, Choudhary K, Das S, Lakshmy R, Kiran U. Comparison of ε-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid in thoracic aortic surgery: Clinical efficacy and safety. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013;27:1201-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Martin K, Knorr J, Breuer T, Gertler R, Macguill M, Lange R, et al. Seizures after open heart surgery: Comparison of ε-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011;20-5.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Koster A, Faraoni D, Levy JH. Antifibrinolytic therapy for cardiac surgery: An update Anesthesiology 2015;123:214-21.  Back to cited text no. 25
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Swapnil Verma
Department of Anesthesia, CTOT, International Block, First Floor, Apollo Hospital Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aca.ACA_142_18

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Tranexamic Acid Dosing in Craniosynostosis Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
Devon B. O’Donnell, Sima Vazquez, Jacob D. Greisman, Anaz Uddin, Gillian Graifman, Jose F. Dominguez, Elizabeth Zellner, Carrie R. Muh
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open. 2022; 10(10): e4526
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top