ACA App
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
Users online: 91 Small font size Default font size Increase font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
     
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed797    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded75    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO EDITOR  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 387
Is Off-pump cardiac surgery ready for goal-directed therapy?


Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Care, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication12-Jul-2017
 

How to cite this article:
Slagt C. Is Off-pump cardiac surgery ready for goal-directed therapy?. Ann Card Anaesth 2017;20:387

How to cite this URL:
Slagt C. Is Off-pump cardiac surgery ready for goal-directed therapy?. Ann Card Anaesth [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Oct 23];20:387. Available from: https://www.annals.in/text.asp?2017/20/3/387/210417


The Editor,

With great interest, I have read the article by Kapoor et al. recently published.[1] Hemodynamic monitoring to improve the outcome on high-risk patient and intensive care patients has been the focus of research for many years. Recently, negative studies were published.[2],[3] Many confounders exist because of the complexity of these patient groups. When “soft” end-points are used, as in this study, good definitions need to be available. The outcome advantage in the goal-directed group is presented without real definitions concerning ready for discharge, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or home readiness.

Kern and Shoemaker have shown that hemodynamic intervention has only value as the complication rate in a population is high >20%.[4] Mortality and morbidity before the intervention study are not mentioned in this article. I miss the power calculation to establish the right amount of patients to be included in this study. Hence, what these differences really mean remains to be seen. It is important to differentiate between statistical significant and clinical relevant differences.

Hemodynamic monitoring during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is challenging, especially when an anastomosis is performed posterior of heart. Problems with the filling of the heart and cardiac arrhythmias are no exception. The hemodynamic measurement using the EV1000/FloTrac under these clinical instable conditions is almost impossible. Hence, what remains is a 4-h period where the patients are ventilated in the ICU in which the stroke volume variation (SVV) could have been used. However, ventilation mode, tidal volume, and other SVV limitations are not mentioned. Fluid boluses are given per 100 ml, is this amount clinical relevant? In this article, I miss the amount of fluid given during different stages of the operation/IC stay. The same concerns apply for the amount of inotropic or vasopressor support. Both fluids and isotopes being essential in goal-directed therapy.

Finally, the suggested “good” agreement of the first and second generation software was not confirmed in our meta-analysis of the FloTrac/Vigileo system. The percentage of error in the cardiac and postcardiac surgery studies referenced by the authors was above the suggested 30%.[5]

I would like to invite the authors to explain the findings of their study as I cannot explain them from the presented data.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Kapoor PM, Magoon R, Rawat RS, Mehta Y, Taneja S, Ravi R, et al. Goal-directed therapy improves the outcome of high-risk cardiac patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass. Ann Card Anaesth 2017;20:83-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
Pestaña D, Espinosa E, Eden A, Nájera D, Collar L, Aldecoa C, et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic optimization using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in major abdominal surgery: A prospective, randomized, multicenter, pragmatic trial: POEMAS Study (PeriOperative goal-directed thErapy in Major Abdominal Surgery). Anesth Analg 2014;119:579-87.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
ProCESS Investigators, Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, Barnato AE, Weissfeld LA, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1683-93.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kern JW, Shoemaker WC. Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 2002;30:1686-92.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Slagt C, Malagon I, Groeneveld AB. Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine cardiac output and stroke volume variation. Br J Anaesth 2014;112:626-37.  Back to cited text no. 5
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Cor Slagt
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, PO Box. 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aca.ACA_56_17

Rights and Permissions




 

Top