| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||1797 |
| Printed||54 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||208 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
Click on image for details.
|Year : 2017
: 20 | Issue : 4 | Page
|Low-dose intravenous ketamine for postcardiac surgery pain: Effect on opioid consumption and the incidence of chronic pain
Jennifer Cogan1, Geneviève Lalumière1, Grisell Vargas-Schaffer2, Alain Deschamps1, Zeynep Yegin3
1 Department of Anesthesia, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
2 Pain Center of Hôtel-Dieu du CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
3 Department of Nursing, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
Click here for correspondence address and
|Date of Web Publication||9-Oct-2017|
| Abstract|| |
Background: Recent meta-analyses have concluded that low-dose intravenous ketamine infusions (LDKIs) during the postoperative period may help to decrease acute and chronic postoperative pain after major surgery. Aims: This study aims to evaluate the level of pain at least 3 months after surgery for patients treated with a postoperative LDKI versus patients who were not treated with a postoperative LDKI. Methods: Administrative and Ethics Board approval were obtained for this study. We performed a retrospective chart review for all patients receiving LDKI, and equal number of age-, sex-, and surgery-matched patients who did not receive LDKI. Low-dose ketamine was prepared using 100 mg of ketamine in 100 ml of normal saline and run between 50 and 200 mcg/kg/h. Results: We reviewed 115 patients with LDKI and 115 without LDKI. The average age was 63.1 years, 73% of the patients were men and sex was evenly distributed between LDKI and non-LDKI. The average duration of the ketamine infusions was 26.8 h with the average dose being 169.9 mg. At an average of 9 months after surgery, 42% of the ketamine group and 38% of the nonketamine group stated that they had had pain on discharge. Of these patients, 30% of the ketamine group and 26% of the nonketamine group still had pain at the time of the phone call. Women in both groups had more acute and chronic pain than men. Conclusion: These results show that LDKI does not promote a decrease in long-term postoperative pain.
Keywords: Cardiac surgery, chronic pain, ketamine
|How to cite this article:|
Cogan J, Lalumière G, Vargas-Schaffer G, Deschamps A, Yegin Z. Low-dose intravenous ketamine for postcardiac surgery pain: Effect on opioid consumption and the incidence of chronic pain. Ann Card Anaesth 2017;20:395-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Cogan J, Lalumière G, Vargas-Schaffer G, Deschamps A, Yegin Z. Low-dose intravenous ketamine for postcardiac surgery pain: Effect on opioid consumption and the incidence of chronic pain. Ann Card Anaesth [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 9];20:395-8. Available from: http://www.annals.in/text.asp?2017/20/4/395/216255
| Introduction|| |
Over the past two decades, many studies have been published on the effects of ketamine for postoperative pain. Several meta-analyses focusing on acute pain, perioperative pain in general, and thoracic pain in particular that have been published on this subject have concluded that low-dose intravenous ketamine infusions (LDKIs) during the postoperative period may help to relieve acute and chronic pain after major surgery, reduce the consumption of narcotics with only minimal sides effects.,,,,, Similarly, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have also noted decreased opioid consumption, decreased adverse effects as well as improved pain scores and satisfaction with LDKI.,, In cardiac surgery and the cardiac Intensive Care Unit (ICU), only one review has focused specifically on ketamine, without truly addressing its use for pain management.
We hypothesized that patients receiving ketamine in the postoperative period would consume less opioids and would have less chronic pain following cardiac surgery. Therefore, in our cardiac surgery specialized care center, some anesthesiologists used a low-dose ketamine infusion for all consecutive patients to whom they provided anesthesia with the intent of decreasing perioperative opioid consumption and the prevalence of postoperative chronic pain. This paper presents the results obtained and lessons learned from LDKI.
| Methods|| |
This case–control study combines a retrospective review of prospectively collected data and a prospective evaluation of chronic pain after surgery. Administrative and Ethics Committee approval was obtained: ICM-2011-1274.
Cases were defined as all patients >18 years of age, who had cardiac surgery involving a median sternotomy and who received an infusion of ketamine on arrival in the ICU. Controls were age-, sex-, and surgery-matched patients who did not receive a ketamine infusion (−LDKI) in the postoperative period. The exclusion criteria included all patients for whom the standard extubation protocol was not applied and all patients in the nonketamine group who received enteral ketamine as an adjuvant pain medication in the postoperative period.
All patients, in both groups, received induction and maintenance anesthesia at the anesthesiologist's discretion and were administered the standard postoperative pain protocol, adjusted for individual needs by the acute pain team on a daily basis. LDKIs were prepared using 100 mg of ketamine in 100 ml of normal saline and infused at a rate between 50 and 200 mcg/kg/h for a maximum of 2 days.
Patients were contacted by phone between 6 and 13 months after their surgery by a research assistant to evaluate the prevalence of pain at the time of discharge (yes/no) and prevalence of surgery-related pain during the last 24 h (yes/no).
Descriptive results are presented as means ± standard deviations for continuous variables and as frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables. Comparisons of demographics and clinical data at baseline were based on Student's t-tests for continuous variables and on Pearson's Chi-square statistics for categorical variables. The primary endpoint (pain postsurgery) was compared between groups. Statistical analysis was completed using SAS version 9.2 by the Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center.
| Results|| |
A total of 230 patients were included in the study, 115 who received low-dose postoperative ketamine (+LDKI) and 115 who did not receive low-dose postoperative ketamine (−LDKI). Follow-up response rates were 94.4% and 88.8% respectively for the ketamine and nonketamine groups. Descriptive analysis showed that there were no differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, weight, height, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, type or length the surgery, and cardiac bypass time [Table 1] and [Table 2].
|Table 1: Descriptive statistics of the study population for the (+LDKI) and (-LDKI) groups|
Click here to view
The average duration of the infusion was 26.8 h, the average dose was 169.9 mg, and the mean +LDKI dose in mcg/kg/h was 86.2 [Table 3]. Infusion of ketamine did not affect the length of intubation, the length of ICU or hospital stay but did show that patients required more opioid (morphine equivalents) in milligrams per kilogram before extubation [Table 4]. [Table 5] presents intraoperative medications for both groups and [Table 6] presents postoperative opioid consumption, in morphine equivalents, showing a slightly higher postoperative consumption of opioids in the ketamine group.
|Table 4: Length of intubation, length of ICU and hospital stay and postoperative morphine consumption for the + LDKI and -LDKI groups|
Click here to view
At follow-up, an average of 9 months after surgery, 47.8% of the (+LDKI) group and 44.6% of the (−LDKI) group stated that they had had pain on discharge. Of these patients, 37% of the (+LDKI) group and 33% of the (−LDKI) group still had pain at the time of the phone call [Table 7] and [Table 8]. Neither of these differences was statically significant. However, a significantly higher proportion of women in both the (+LDKI) and (−LDKI) group complained of pain on discharge and chronic pain, at the time of the phone call [Table 7] and [Table 8].
|Table 7: Proportion of patients in the -LDKI group who had pain at discharge and at the time of phone call|
Click here to view
|Table 8: Proportion of patients in the+LDKI group who had pain at discharge and at the time of phone call|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
This case–control study evaluates the prevalence of chronic pain at an average of 9 months' postcardiac surgery in two groups of patients: Those who received ketamine and those who did not. The results do not demonstrate that ketamine infusion decreased the level of opioid consumption nor chronic postoperative pain. Ketamine infusions did not result in a lower proportion of patients complaining of pain between 6 and 12 months after surgery, nor did it have an impact at the time of discharge as patients in the ketamine group recalled slightly higher levels of pain at the time of discharge than those who did not receive ketamine. What is compelling, however, is that women report pain at discharge (approximately, 65% in both groups) and long-term (approximately 50% in both groups) than men. This difference is statistically significant.
It is interesting to note that although most published RCT's and meta-analysis studies, including those referenced above, show a modest positive effect for ketamine as a perioperative analgesic none have evaluated the influence of ketamine on the prevalence of chronic pain. This study provides evidence in real-life anesthesia that a postoperative ketamine infusion was not effective in decreasing chronic pain after cardiac surgery. This real-world effectiveness study is the first to evaluate the potential long-term benefits of ketamine for decreasing chronic postoperative pain after cardiac surgery.
Of note is that narcotic consumption in the postoperative period was significantly higher in the +LDKI group. This may be because anesthesiologists who administered an LDKI postoperatively also tended to use higher doses of intraoperative opioid when compared to all comers in the non-LDKI group. This raises the question of whether or not hyperalgesia or some other postoperative pain protocol factor could be a contributing to the higher doses of narcotics seen postoperatively in the +LDKI group. Although some studies have indicated that high dose opioids are a factor in postoperative hyperalgesia most implicate remifentanil. Few human data are available with respect to more long-acting opioids.
This study demonstrates the effectiveness, as opposed to the efficacy, of a systematically applied technique in a real-world clinical situation. Evaluation of the data showed that the technique was not effective in decreasing postoperative pain and consequently led the investigators to cease application of the technique. One hypothesis for these results is that the lack of postoperative effectiveness may have been related to the fact that both groups received intraoperative ketamine. An intraoperative dose of ketamine may be all that is required to provide a decrease in postoperative pain and adding a continuous infusion provides no added benefit.
One weakness of this study is the lack of prospective data for pain scores at discharge as it is possible that there is a recall bias related to the level of pain experienced by patients after surgery. This is somewhat tempered by prospectively collected chronic pain scores.
| Conclusion|| |
In a real-world, effectiveness study, low-dose intravenous ketamine (+LDKI) for post cardiac surgery pain did not result in a decreased incidence of chronic pain. A significantly large number of patients, women, in particular, are at high risk for long-term pain after cardiac surgery. Measures such as daily individualized patient care plan closely monitored and tailored analgesic regimens and special attention to women undergoing surgery need to be implemented to decrease the burden chronic pain after cardiac surgery.
Authors would like thank to Natalka Bachynsky and Jonathan Lacharité for their work on data collection and organization.
Financial support and sponsorship
Financial help was provided by the Montreal Heart Institute Foundation.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Subramaniam K, Subramaniam B, Steinbrook RA. Ketamine as adjuvant analgesic to opioids: A quantitative and qualitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 2004;99:482-95.
Bell RF, Dahl JB, Moore RA, Kalso E. Peri-operative ketamine for acute post-operative pain: A quantitative and qualitative systematic review (Cochrane review). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49:1405-28.
Elia N, Tramèr MR. Ketamine and postoperative pain – A quantitative systematic review of randomised trials. Pain 2005;113:61-70.
Carstensen M, Møller AM. Adding ketamine to morphine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for acute postoperative pain: A qualitative review of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth 2010;104:401-6.
Dale O, Somogyi AA, Li Y, Sullivan T, Shavit Y. Does intraoperative ketamine attenuate inflammatory reactivity following surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2012;115:934-43.
Laskowski K, Stirling A, McKay WP, Lim HJ. A systematic review of intravenous ketamine for postoperative analgesia. Can J Anaesth 2011;58:911-23.
Nesher N, Serovian I, Marouani N, Chazan S, Weinbroum AA. Ketamine spares morphine consumption after transthoracic lung and heart surgery without adverse hemodynamic effects. Pharmacol Res 2008;58:38-44.
Nesher N, Ekstein MP, Paz Y, Marouani N, Chazan S, Weinbroum AA. Morphine with adjuvant ketamine vs. higher dose of morphine alone for immediate postthoracotomy analgesia. Chest 2009;136:245-52.
Chazan S, Buda I, Nesher N, Paz J, Weinbroum AA. Low-dose ketamine via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device after various transthoracic procedures improves analgesia and patient and family satisfaction. Pain Manag Nurs 2010;11:169-76.
Mazzeffi M, Johnson K, Paciullo C. Ketamine in adult cardiac surgery and the cardiac surgery Intensive Care Unit: An evidence-based clinical review. Ann Card Anaesth 2015;18:202-9.
] [Full text]
Fletcher D, Martinez V. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients after surgery: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2014;112:991-1004.
Kardos P, Worsley S, Singh D, Román-Rodríguez M, Newby DE, Müllerová H. Randomized controlled trials and real-world observational studies in evaluating cardiovascular safety of inhaled bronchodilator therapy in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2016;11:2885-95.
Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8]