ACA App
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
Users online: 37 Small font size Default font size Increase font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
     
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    What's next in c...
    Is soluble uroki...
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1186    
    Printed29    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded190    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents
EDITORIAL  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 211-213
From lactate to soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor: The journey for ideal cardiac biomarker: Are we there in 2016?


Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, CNC, AIIMS, New Delhi, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication1-Apr-2016
 

How to cite this article:
Kapoor PM. From lactate to soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor: The journey for ideal cardiac biomarker: Are we there in 2016?. Ann Card Anaesth 2016;19:211-3

How to cite this URL:
Kapoor PM. From lactate to soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor: The journey for ideal cardiac biomarker: Are we there in 2016?. Ann Card Anaesth [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Oct 1];19:211-3. Available from: http://www.annals.in/text.asp?2016/19/2/211/179587

This special cardiac biomarkers issue, we have juxtaposed ten of the biggest trends on the subject and stunning upcoming new faces of cardiac biomarkers, in one frame. They create essential reading in aca′s original and review articles.


New biomarkers are being constantly developed and made available for diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. The most important aspect of adopting any new biomarker in clinical practice is its ability to change treatment, impact the duration of stay, improve outcomes in the patient disease, and ultimately prove to be cost effective. [1]

Biomarker measurements are predictive of a need of urgent care in an emergency, cardiac triage. Causal pathways for the progression of atheromatous coronary plaque formation in most cardiac patient's remains poorly understood, hence, the need for biomarkers for early detection.

An important part of our understanding the treatment of acute coronary syndrome is the recognition that sensitive markers of myocardial injury, specifically cardiac troponin I (CTN I) and CTN T, actually define a group of patients who are sick and sensitivity of troponins over the previous creatine kinase (CK-MB) has literally changed the operational definition of what constitutes an acute myocardial infarction, today in 2016! The purpose of this editorial is to provide a better understanding of the journey of cardiac biomarkers from CK-MB, lactate to brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), to the high-sensitivity troponin, lactate clearance, and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and their potential role in predicting survival in the cardiac ICU (see page nos 4, 7, 105 and 112) respectively.

One of the most crucial, unresolved challenges in face of tissue hypoxia and cardiac shock is to detect a physiological variable that closely detects cellular hypoperfusion and thus be used as an accurate resuscitation target. Hyperlactemia has traditionally been used as a signal of tissue hypoxia. [2] Above serum lactate, lactate clearance has been shown in recent times to be of prognostic value in community-acquired pneumonia, [3] severe sepsis [4] congenital heart defects corrections such as arterial switch operation with regressed left ventricular. [5] In this issue, read on lactate clearance as a prognostic marker in Tetralogy of Fallot and also how endothelin, SCVO 2 , and lactate are related! Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, makes interesting reading telling us about interrelations between renal function and ischemia and how to better outcomes. Lactate clearance, endothelin, NGAL, and albumin levels (particularly, in cyanotics, are here to stay and more randomized, multicentric trials are needed with evidence-based algorithms to prove their utility. [6],[7]

BNP as a biomarker in heart failure and for prediction of postoperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac and noncardiac patients is already proven. [8],[9] Read on "N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in high-cardiovascular-risk patients for noncardiac surgery: What is the current prognostic evidence?" by  Malhotra et al. to know the fate of BNP in heart failure. Adrenomedullin and suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) are of great diagnostic value in congestive heart failure in noncardiac patients and may soon replace BNP, which has moderate sensitivity and specificity. [10],[16]

Cardiac biomarkers are ideally similar to any pharmaceutical intervention. [11] However, for majority of the present day clinical cardiac biomarkers in the market, the evidence base is weak; the majority of studies are prospective, observational ones and very limited in terms of clinical trials. Another major hindrance to quick adoption of most cardiac biomarkers is the concept of clinical plausibility of a biomarker [Figure 1]. The former rests on adopting the right patient population on whom to use the biomarker. For example, in a patient of chest pain, the diagnostic modality moved from the electrocardiogram (once the gold standard) to the reigning troponins, but the latter is excellent for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and not STEMI! [12] In the latter group, the prior probability of disease is close to 100%, and the management pathway is well defined, and biomarkers are not useful for diagnosis. In STEMI, biomarker evaluation (microRNA 208 (miRNA-208) is the upcoming biomarker in STEMI) if it fails implies that the biomarker does not work for diagnosis of myocardial infarction. [13],[14] Troponins are here to stay as mentioned by  Weber et al., in this special biomarker issue, but soluble CD40, myeloperoxidase, and ischemia modified albumin went into disrepute because of the inaccuracy detected in the analytical performance of the assay used for their detection. [1]


   What's next in cardiac biomarker profile? Top


0Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP), glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB (GPBB), ST2, miRNA, and suPAR are the upcoming markers of future. They are present in a very high concentration in the myocardium (5 mg/g) and are released promptly during ischemia. GPBB is elevated within 2 hours and maintains a baseline for 12-24 h hours.


   Is soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor the final answer to the multi-marker approach? Top


0suPAR is being used by cardiologists to outperform CRP at prognosticating CVD. [15] Cyrille et al., in this issue, bring out the importance of suPAR in chronic inflammation, CVD, and critical illness. Is it of additive benefit for predicting the risk of future cardiovascular events? Only more clinical trials will answer this question.

Ultimately, the goal is to use multiple biomarkers to determine the presence, cause, and extent of damage to the cardiac tissue. Lactic dehydrogenase, CK, and CK-MB were used ages ago but have been replaced by the troponins. Troponins are the current standard for diagnosis of myocardial infarction. GPBB, H-FABP, sST2, suPAR, and miRNA have the potential to improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients suspected of an adverse cardiac event. It is time to "Welcome, What lies Ahead" rather than obsessing in a negative way about not having depended on any biomarker, so far in our clinical practice or thinking all existing ones to be futile.

We have moved from lactate to lactate clearance, troponins, BNP, endothelins, NGAL, and now to suPAR. The journey for betterment continues.

 
   References Top

1.
Weber M, Rabenau B, Stanisch M, Nef HM, Möllmann H, Elsässer A, et al. Influence of sample type on soluble CD40 ligand assessment in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Thromb Res 2007;120:811-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Friedman G, De Backer D, Shahla M, Vincent JL. Oxygen supply dependency can characterize septic shock. Intensive Care Med 1998;24:118-23.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Abd Elaziz MK, Abd Elgalil AD. Prognostic value of lactate clearance in severe community acquired pneumonia. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc 2014;63:1053-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bolvardi E, Malmir J, Reihani H, Hashemian AM, Bahramian M, Khademhosseini P, et al. The role of lactate clearance as a predictor of organ dysfunction and mortality in patients with severe sepsis. Mater Sociomed 2016;28:57-60.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Singh SP, Chauhan S, Bisoi AK, Sahoo M. Lactate clearance for initiating and weaning off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a child with regressed left ventricle after arterial switch operation. Ann Card Anaesth 2016;19:188-91.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
6.
De Miguel C, Joshua SS, Malgorzata K, Eman YG, David MP. Endothelin-1 and the kidney: New perspectives and recent findings. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2016;25:35-41.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kapoor PM, Subramanian A, Malik V, Devagorou V. Perioperative endothelin levels in patients undergoing intracardiac repair for tetralogy of fallot. J Card Surg 2014;29:670-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Leto L, Testa M, Feola M. Correlation between B-type natriuretic peptide and functional/cognitive parameters in discharged congestive heart failure patients. Int J Endocrinol; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Toufektzian L, Zisis C, Balaka C, Roussakis A. Effectiveness of brain natriuretic peptide in predicting postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing non-cardiac thoracic surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015;20:654-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kapoor PM, Subramanian A, Malik V, Kiran U, Velayoudham D. B-type natriuretic peptide as prognostic marker in tetralogy of Fallot surgery. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2015;23:146-52.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Collinson PO. Evaluating new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in cardiovascular disease. Heart 2013;99:757-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011;32:2999-3054.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S, Steuer S, Stelzig C, Hartwiger S, et al. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N Engl J Med 2009;361:858-67.   Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D, Tzikas S, Roth A, Czyz E, et al. Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2009;361:868-77.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hodges GW, Bang CN, Wachtell K, Eugen-Olsen J, Jeppensen JL. suPAR: A new biomarker for cardiovascular disease? Can J Cardiol 2015;31:1293-302.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Anita K. Malhotra, Harish Ramakrishna. N-terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide in high cardiovascular-risk patients for noncardiac surgery: What is the current prognostic evidence?. Annals on Cardiac Anaesth 2016;19:314-20.  Back to cited text no. 16
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Poonam Malhotra Kapoor
Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, CNC, AIIMS, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-9784.179587

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top