ACA App
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
Home | About us | Editorial Board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
Users online: 1263 Small font size Default font size Increase font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
     
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Methods
    Device character...
    Statistical methods
    Results
    Discussion
    Acknowledgements
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3443    
    Printed158    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded653    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 40    

Recommend this journal

 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 121-126
Comparison of simultaneous estimation of cardiac output by four techniques in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery- a prospective observational study


Wockhardt Heart Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka., India

Click here for correspondence address and email
 

   Abstract 

We prospectively compared four techniques of cardiac output measurement: bolus thermodilution cardiac output (TDCO), continuous cardiac output (CCO), pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO™), and Flowtrac (FCCO), simultaneously in fifteen patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). All the patients received pulmonary artery catheter (capable of measuring both bolus thermodilution cardiac output and CCO), PiCCO arterial cannula in the left and FCCO in the right femoral artery. Cardiac indices (CI) were obtained every fifteen minutes by using all the four techniques. TDCO was treated as 'control' and the rest were treated as 'test' values. Interchangeability of techniques with TDCO was assessed by Bland and Altman plotting and mountain plot. Four hundred and thirty eight sets of data were obtained from fifteen patients. The values of cardiac output varied between 1 to 6.9 L/min. We found that the values of all the techniques were interchangeable. At certain times, the values of CI measured by both PiCCO and FCCO appeared erratic. The values of CI measured simultaneously appeared in the following descending order of accuracy; TDCO>CCO>FCCO>PiCCO ( the % times TDCO correlated with CCO, FCCO, PiCCO was 93, 86 and 80 respectively). The bias and precision (in L/ min) for CCO were 0.03, 0.06, PiCCO 0.13, 0.1 and flowtrac 0.15, 0.04 respectively suggesting interchangeability. We conclude that the cardiac output measured by CCO technique and the pulse contour as measured by PiCCO and FCCO were interchangeable with TDCO more than 80% of the times.

Keywords: Cardiac output, Pulse contour, Thermodilution, Off-pump coronary artery bypass

How to cite this article:
Chakravarthy M, Patil T A, Jayaprakash K, Kalligudd P, Prabhakumar D, Jawali V. Comparison of simultaneous estimation of cardiac output by four techniques in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery- a prospective observational study. Ann Card Anaesth 2007;10:121-6

How to cite this URL:
Chakravarthy M, Patil T A, Jayaprakash K, Kalligudd P, Prabhakumar D, Jawali V. Comparison of simultaneous estimation of cardiac output by four techniques in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery- a prospective observational study. Ann Card Anaesth [serial online] 2007 [cited 2020 Feb 20];10:121-6. Available from: http://www.annals.in/text.asp?2007/10/2/121/37937



   Introduction Top


Measurement of the cardiac output (CO) and other derived variables helps anaesthesiologists to treat haemodynamic disturbances in the perioperative period. The need for continuous measurement of these values is relevant during off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Currently more than five techniques of continuous CO (CCO) measurement are available. Despite limitations, CO by thermodilution technique (TDCO) is still considered the gold standard, and any new method is compared with it. [1],[2],[3],[4] Manufacturers of the equipments such as CCO, Lithium dilution cardiac output (LIDCO), pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO™) and the recently introduced Flotrac™, claim that each of their equipment can continuously and accurately measure CO on a beat-to-beat basis. The aim of the preent study was to compare these techniques with TDCO.


   Methods Top


Fifteen normotensive patients undergoing OPCAB under general anaesthesia were included in the study after obtaining ethical committee approval. A written informed consent for surgery and participation in the study was obtained from each patient. Presence of preoperative inotropic therapy, intra-aortic balloon pump, ventilator therapy, peripheral vascular disease, disease of the organ systems (renal, hepatic and metabolic disorders), intracardiac shunts, regurgitation of pulmonary and/ or tricuspid valves and emergency surgery were taken as exclusion criteria.

All patients were premedicated with fentanyl 2 µg/kg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg, thirty minutes prior to surgery. Upon arrival in the operation theatre, both femoral arteries were cannulated; right with 18 gauge secalon T cannula and the left with the custom made PiCCO cannula. Right internal jugular vein was cannulated with 8.5 French introducer sheath and a continuous thermodilution CO catheter was inserted in to the pulmonary artery using pressure waveform as the guide to identify cardiac chambers (Swan Ganz CCO/VIP, Edward Lifesciences, LLC, Irvine, CA USA). The vigilance monitor was used to measure CO and base line CO by CCO technique was noted down. Whenever difficulty was encountered in achieving a wedge position, an image intensifier was used to guide the pulmonary artery catheter to an acceptable position. CO was measured by bolus thermodilution technique and this value was noted as basal TDCO. The right femoral arterial cannula was connected to Flowtrac™monitor (Edward Lifesciences, LLC, Irvine, CA USA) and the slave connection from the Flowtrac monitor was connected to the haemodynamic monitor for monitoring invasive arterial pressure. The custom made arterial cannula for PiCCO monitor was inserted in the left femoral artery and connected to PiCCO plus monitor (Pulsion Medical Systems AG, Stahlgruberring, Munich, Germany). An initial thermodilution curve was obtained on the PiCCO monitor by injecting 15 ml of saline through the proximal lumen of the Swan Ganz catheter at temperature of 40 C. Arterial pressure waveform was obtained from the left femoral artery; the monitor displayed the CO on a beat-to­beat basis. Baseline values of CO by TDCO, CCO, Flowtrac and PiCCO were obtained prior to induction of anaesthesia.


   Device characteristics Top
:

PiCCO provides continuous estimate of stroke volume and the CO is derived from the arterial pressure waveform. Stroke volume is calculated using a proprietary algorithm using beat duration, ejection duration, mean arterial pressure and modulus and phase of the first waveform harmonic. In order to measure CO on a beat-to­beat basis, one needs to obtain an initial calibration against an independent measure of CO usually against thermodilution technique.

Flowtrac device uses arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine the CO from an arterial pressure based algorithm that utilises the relationship between pulse pressure and stroke volume. It consists of a special transducer that attaches to an existing arterial cannula and then connects to a processing and display unit (Vigileo™). The arterial waveform is assessed at 100 Hz and the standard deviation of the pulse pressure is determined over a 20 s window. The algorithm takes two additional factors; vessel compliance and peripheral resistance.

Intermittent bolus or continuous thermodilution CO was measured using Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheter. Bolus CO measurement was performed using 10 ml of normal saline at room temperature, average of 3 values were considered. The continuous CO was viewed in the 'stat' mode, and the most recent data was taken as the value for comparison. The values from PiCCO and flowtrac were recorded at the time of third thermodilution injection.

General anaesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.5 mg/kg, fentanyl 2 µg/kg administered intravenously and inhalation of 1 to 3 % of sevoflurane or isoflurane. Intubation was facilitated with 1 mg/kg rocuronium administered intravenously. Oral endotracheal tube was placed in the trachea and controlled ventilation was commenced. After stabilizing haemodynamic disturbances that may have occurred following induction of general anaesthesia, CO was measured every 15 minutes by using all the 4 techniques­during surgery. Heparinization was achieved with 200 units/kg of heparin and an activated clotting time of >250 sec was considered adequate for surgery. Haemodynamic interventions were carried out based on the haemodynamic parameters obtained from the TDCO. We empirically divided our data in to three groups; CO of < 4.0 L/min , between 4 and 6 L/min and in excess of 6 L/min.

Intravenous infusion of inotropic agent and/ or intravenous fluid boluses (2-3 ml/kg) and/or appropriate tilt of the operating table were implemented to restore haemodynamic values to acceptable levels. Intravenous infusion of dopamine in the dose of 5 to 7.5 µg/kg/min was the inotrope of choice. Other inotropic and vasodilatory agents were used depending on the values of heart rate, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery wedge pressure and systemic vascular resistance index.

Surgical access was obtained through mid­sternotomy. Left internal mammary artery was harvested and other suitable conduits such as saphenous vein and radial artery were harvested as required. All the patients underwent OPCAB surgery as planned. Left internal mammary artery was grafted first to left anterior descending artery. Other conduits were grafted thereafter. After the completion of anastomosis, protamine sulfate in the dose of 2 mg/kg was used to neutralize residual heparin. Return of activated clotting time in the range of 120 to 130 seconds was considered acceptable. A blinded observer recorded the CO­from the monitor at intervals of 15 minutes throughout the surgery.


   Statistical methods Top
:

Interchangeability of techniques was assessed by plotting values obtained by each of the techniques against TDCO values. Bias and precision between the techniques was assessed by using Bland and Altman plotting. [5] To assess the interchangeability of the techniques, 'mountain plot' tool (Krouwer et al [6] ) was used as complementary to Bland and Altman plotting. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.


   Results Top


There were 9 males, 8 diabetics, 5 hypertensives, 2 asthmatics and one had a past history of cerebrovascular accident. After excluding invalid recordings due to diathermy disturbance, physiotherapy and routine nursing care, 438 sets of data were obtained from fifteen patients. All patients required 5-10 µg/kg/min of dopamine infusion during the intraoperative period. The variation in the CO in our study was from 1 to 6.9 L/ min. [Table 1] shows the bias and precision of other techniques compared to TDCO. Low bias and precision suggests interchangeability of techniques.

Correlation of CO measured by various techniques was performed with TDCO [Table 2]. The correlation co-efficient (r) was 0.6, 0.49 and 0.4 for CCO, FCCO and PiCCO respectively. CCO measurements correlated with TDCO 91.5% times, underestimated 4.1% times and overestimated 4.3% of times. The errors occurred when TDCO values were <4 L/min. FCCO measurements correlated with TDCO 86.3% times, underestimated 8.2 % of times and overestimated 6.4 % times. Underestimation by FCCO occurred more often than overestimation (34 times vs 28). PiCCO measurements correlated with TDCO 80.8% times, while both underestimation and overestimation occurred almost at the same frequency (8.9 and 8.6%). In contrast to the measurements by FCCO, PiCCO measurements tended to underestimate TDCO <4 L/min (23 underestimation when TDCO <4 L/min compared to 15 underestimations when TDCO >4 L/min) and overestimate TDCO>6 L/ min (24 overestimation when TDCO >6 L/min, compared to 15 when TDCO <6 L/min).

Bland and Altman plot of CCO versus TDCO shows mean difference (bias) of 0.03 L/min. The limits of agreement (2 SD) were +1.4 and -1.4. [Figure 1] shows distribution of the values mostly within the limits of agreement suggesting interchangeability. Non-interchangeability of a few values may be because of time delay between the two techniques and is depicted in the figure with values of high bias (>5). [Figure 2] and [Figure 3] show the Bland and Altman plots of measurements obtained by PiCCO and FCCO respectively. Plotting of both PiCCO and FCCO as compared to TDCO are depicted well within the limits of agreement. Values of FCCO appear to be distributed in a narrower range of distribution (±2.24 for PiCCO as compared to ±0.66 for FCCO).

Mountain plot, which is generally used complementary to Bland and Altman plots also confirmed the interchangeability of four techniques [Figure 4]. Observations are made based on comparison of shape of one 'mountain' with the other. The median between TDCO and CCO, FCCO and PiCCO as assessed by mountain plots were 0.0, -0.40 and -0.10 respectively. After comparing the plots, the techniques could be classified in the decreasing order of accuracy as follows: TDCO>CCO>FCCO>PiCCO. Our observation made from mountain plot was similar to analysis of Bland and Altman plotting. Absence of interchangeability, which occurred with the techniques is seen as either the base or the apex of the mountain not aligning exactly with each other.


   Discussion Top


In clinical practice, CO measurement is conventionally carried out by using bolus thermodilution technique. For the sake of convenience, CCO measurement technique has been introduced. The continuous technique measured by using Swan Ganz catheter equipped with a heating coil, is not truly continuous. A delay of 140 to 240 seconds occurs during measurement. In order to avoid these fallacies, CCO measurements in real time have been introduced in the market. PiCCO and FCCO are two such techniques. PiCCO technology employs patented algorithm to calculate beat-to-beat CO after initial validation by a termodilution technique through pulse contour analysis. Although this technique has been described as semi-invasive, clinicians need to insert a catheter in the central vein to obtain a thermodilution curve against which the subsequent arterial waveforms are compared. (thermodilution curve that is required from initial calibration is produced by injecting a known quantity of saline in the right atrium and a 'wash out' curve is generated at the pulmonary artery). It is not necessary to introduce pulmonary artery catheter in order to measure CO by PiCCO. Our study suffers from the potential weakness that all the measurements made by these techniques may not have been in real time with respect to each other, because of potential delay in the measurement and display of CO by CCO technique. However, TDCO also has similar setback, because it is usually averaged over 3 values.

In order to obviate the need for any form of central venous cannulation and calibration, Edward Life Sciences have recently introduced a device called Flowtrac , which can measure the continuous CO on a beat-to-beat basis. The advantage of this technique is that there is no need to calibrate with an initial thermodilution curve.

Various authors [1],[2],[3],[4],[7],[8],[9],[10] have compared the accuracy of one measurement of CO to other. We chose to compare the above mentioned techniques in patients undergoing OPCAB because, sudden fluctuations in the mean arterial pressure, and CO are known to occur during OCPAB. We considered TDCO as the 'control' and others (PiCCO, CCO, and FCCO) as 'tests'. PiCCO and FCCO depend on the arterial waveform for appropriate measurements, therefore patients with peripheral arterial disease were excluded from the study. Presence of inotropic agents and intra-aortic balloon pump in the preoperative period were also excluded from the study, because these may cause variations in the arterial waveforms. As has been previously observed, we have noted good degree of interchangeability between CCO and TDCO. Singh et al [7] observed similar excellent correlation, accuracy, and precision among the 3 methods of measuring CO in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery. We observed that changes occurring in the haemodynamic parameters during lifting of the heart, positioning of the heart to expose the coronary arteries were immediately displayed by PiCCO and FCCO, while the display on TDCO and CCO were not immediate. The authors are of the opinion that this aspect of PiCCO and FCCO makes them suitable for surgeries where blood pressure changes can occur abruptly. If the arterial trace gets dampened, the estimation of CO by PiCCO and FCCO may get erratic because of the abnormality in the arterial waveform. It is necessary to have heparin flush on an automatic flush device in order to have accurate arterial waveforms all the time when these two techniques are used.

Buhre et al [10] concluded that compared with TDCO, pulse contour analysis enables accurate measurement of continuous CO in patients undergoing MIDCAB but, Yamashila and coworkers [11] could not demonstrate interchangeability of PiCCO with TDCO in patients undergoing OPCAB. The interchangeability of FCCO with TDCO was described by Manecke. [12] Although, our observations are similar to Buhre and Manecke, we observed that at times, the values displayed by PiCCO and FCCO were non-interchangeable as compared to TDCO. These inaccuracies may be due to improper arterial waveforms caused by kinking of arterial cannula, positioning of the heart for grafting and external pressure on the course of the artery. Non-interchangeability of a few values of PiCCO and FCCO are seen on the Bland and Altman plotting [Figure 2] and [Figure 3] in patients undergoing OPCAB. It is true that the gold standard TDCO is an invasive technique, but other non-invasive or semi-invasive techniques need further validation. Both FCCO and PiCCO do not require pulmonary artery catheter insertion, but PiCCO requires a central venous catheter. Additionally, FCCO does not need any calibration against another dye dilution technique and is capable of measuring CO based on the arterial pressure waveforms.

We conclude that the CO measurement by TDCO, CCO PiCCO and FCCO have good agreement and can be interchanged in patients undergoing OPCAB.


   Acknowledgements Top


  1. Kuralayanapalya Suresh, Scientist (Statistics), National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bangalore-560030, Karnataka, India, for statistical assistance
  2. Professor Gopinath Ramachandran, Professor and head of the department, anaesthesia and critical care, Nizam's institute of medical sciences, Hyderabad, India, for guidance.
  3. Dr Dilip Kulkarni, Additional professor of anaesthesia, Nizam's institute of medical sciences, Hyderabad, India, for statistical assistance in creating 'mountain plots'.


 
   References Top

1.Tsutsui M, Mori T, Aramaki Y, Fukuda I, Kazama T. A comparison of two methods for continuous cardiac output measurement: Pulse CO Vs CCO. Masui 2004; 53: 929-33.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  
2.Schulz K, Abel HH, Werning P. Comparison between continuous and intermittent thermodilution measurement of cardiac output during coronary artery bypass operation. Anaesthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1997; 32: 226-33.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Jonas MM, Tanser SJ. Lithium dilution measurement of cardiac output and arterial pulse waveform analysis: an indicator dilution calibrated beat-by-beat system for continuous estimation of cardiac output. Curr Opin Crit Care 2002; 8: 257-61.   Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
4.Su NY, Huang CJ, Tsai P, Hsu YW, Hung YC, Cheng CR. Cardiac output measurement during cardiac surgery: esophageal Doppler versus pulmonary artery catheter. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 2002; 40: 127-33.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.Krouwer JS, Monti KL. A simple, graphical method to evaluate laboratory assays. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1995; 33: 525-27.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Singh A, Juneja R, Mehta Y, Trehan N. Comparison of continuous, stat, and intermittent cardiac output measurements in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002; 16: 186-90.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
8.Hogue CW Jr, Rosenbloom M, McCawley C, Lappas DG. Comparison of cardiac output measurement by continuous thermodilution with electromagnetometry in adult cardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1994; 8: 631-35.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  
9.Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Pompei L, Coccia C, Pietropaoli P. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 350-56.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
10.Buhre W, Weyland A, Kazmaier S, et al. Comparison of cardiac output assessed by pulse-contour analysis and thermodilution in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 13: 437-40.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
11.Yamashita K, Nishiyama T, Yokoyama T, Abe H, Manabe M. Cardiac output by Pulse CO is not interchangeable with thermodilution in patients undergoing OPCAB. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 530-34.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
12.Manecke GR. Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005; 2: 523-27.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]

Top
Correspondence Address:
Murali Chakravarthy
Chief Consultant Anesthesiologist, Wockhardt Heart Institute, Bangalore 560052, Karnataka.
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-9784.37937

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Tracking Changes in Cardiac Output
Bernd Saugel,Oliver Grothe,Julia Y. Wagner
Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2015; 121(2): 514
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Accuracy and precision of transcardiopulmonary thermodilution in patients with cardiogenic shock
Bonaventura Schmid,Katrin Fink,Manfred Olschewski,Stephan Richter,Tilmann Schwab,Michael Brunner,Hans-Joerg Busch
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2015;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Hemodynamic Assessment in the Contemporary Intensive Care Unit
Mohamad Kenaan,Mithil Gajera,Sascha N. Goonewardena
Critical Care Clinics. 2014; 30(3): 413
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Current Use of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Cardiac Surgery: A Survey Study
Onkar Judge,Fuhai Ji,Neal Fleming,Hong Liu
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: A state-of the-art review
Marik, P.E.
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2013; 27(1): 121-134
[Pubmed]
6 Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitors: A State-of the-Art Review
Paul E. Marik
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2013; 27(1): 121
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Gastrointestinal Surgery in Older Coronary Heart Disease Patients: Randomized Trial
Hong Zheng,Hai Guo,Jian-rong Ye,Lin Chen,Hai-ping Ma
World Journal of Surgery. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Técnicas disponibles de monitorización hemodinámica. Ventajas y limitaciones
M.L. Mateu Campos,A. Ferrándiz Sellés,G. Gruartmoner de Vera,J. Mesquida Febrer,C. Sabatier Cloarec,Y. Poveda Hernández,X. García Nogales
Medicina Intensiva. 2012; 36(6): 434
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Techniques available for hemodynamic monitoring. Advantages and limitations
M.L. Mateu Campos,A. Ferrándiz Sellés,G. Gruartmoner de Vera,J. Mesquida Febrer,C. Sabatier Cloarec,Y. Poveda Hernández,X. García Nogales
Medicina Intensiva (English Edition). 2012; 36(6): 434
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Effects of goal-directed fluid therapy by the FloTrac/Vigileo system in patients undergoing hepatoma surgery
Tan, J. and Xu, H. and Wang, Y. and Jia, L. and Xing, Y. and Song, Z.
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012; 39(23): 1968-1971
[Pubmed]
11 Assessment of three minimally invasive continuous cardiac output measurement methods in critically ill patients and a review of the literature
Palmers, P.-J. and Vidts, W. and Ameloot, K. and Cordemans, C. and Van Regenmortel, N. and De Laet, I. and Schoonheydt, K. and Dits, H. and Eichhorn, V. and Reuter, D. and Malbrain, M.L.
Anestezjologia Intensywna Terapia. 2012; 44(4): 188-199
[Pubmed]
12 Techniques available for hemodynamic monitoring. Advantages and limitations [Técnicas disponibles de monitorización hemodinámica. Ventajas y limitaciones]
Mateu Campos, M.L. and Ferrándiz Sellés, A. and Gruartmoner de Vera, G. and Mesquida Febrer, J. and Sabatier Cloarec, C. and Poveda Hernández, Y. and García Nogales, X.
Medicina Intensiva. 2012; 36(6): 434-444
[Pubmed]
13 The PiCCO monitor: A review
Liton, E. and Morgan, M.
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2012; 40(3): 393-409
[Pubmed]
14 Cardiac output assessed by invasive and minimally invasive techniques
Lee, A.J. and Cohn, J.H. and Ranasinghe, J.S.
Anesthesiology Research and Practice. 2011; 2011(475151)
[Pubmed]
15 Output performance: Cardiac output by pulse contour analysis
Haskins, S.C.
Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. 2011; 21(4): 305-308
[Pubmed]
16 Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients
Sharma, V. and Singh, A. and Kansara, B. and Karlekar, A.
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2011; 14(2): 104-110
[Pubmed]
17 Output performance: cardiac output by pulse contour analysis
Steve C. Haskins
Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. 2011; 21(4): 305
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 Cardiac Output Assessed by Invasive and Minimally Invasive Techniques
Allison J. Lee,Jennifer Hochman Cohn,J. Sudharma Ranasinghe
Anesthesiology Research and Practice. 2011; 2011: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Changes in arterial blood flow of free flaps after the administration of sildenafil in swine
Andreas Gravvanis, Apostolos Papalois, Iraklis Delikonstantinou, Nicolaos Pentilas, Ioannis Zogogiannis, Dimosthenis Tsoutsos, Dimitrios Karakitsos
Microsurgery. 2011; : n/a
[VIEW] | [DOI]
20 Relationship between N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP) and cardiac cycle efficiency in cardiac surgery
S. Scolletta, G. Ranaldi, F. Carlucci, F. Franchi, S.M. Romano, B. Biagioli
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2010; 64(8): 511
[VIEW] | [DOI]
21 Minimally Invasive Measurement of Cardiac Output during Surgery and Critical Care : A Meta-analysis of Accuracy and Precision
Philip J. Peyton, Simon W. Chong
Anesthesiology. 2010; 113(5): 1220
[VIEW] | [DOI]
22 LiDCO Systems :
Sugantha Sundar, Peter Panzica
International Anesthesiology Clinics. 2010; 48(1): 87-100
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
23 LiDCO systems
Sundar, S. and Panzica, P.
International Anesthesiology Clinics. 2010; 48(1): 87-100
[Pubmed]
24 Cardiac output monitoring: Is there a gold standard and how do the newer technologies compare?
Pugsley, J. and Lerner, A.B.
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2010; 14(4): 274-282
[Pubmed]
25 Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: A meta-analysis of accuracy and precision
Peyton, P.J. and Chong, S.W.
Anesthesiology. 2010; 113(5): 1220-1235
[Pubmed]
26 The less invasive vigileo/FloTrac device for evaluation of the effects of two vasoactive drugs on hemodynamics and tissue perfusion in burn patients with septic shock. A randomized double-blinded trial
Hamden, G.A. and Zakaria, Y.
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2009; 25(1): 49-59
[Pubmed]
27 Continuous Arterial Pressure Waveform-Based Cardiac Output Using the FloTrac/Vigileo: A Review and Meta-analysis
Mayer, J. and Boldt, J. and Poland, R. and Peterson, A. and Manecke Jr., G.R.
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2009; 23(3): 401-406
[Pubmed]
28 Continuous Arterial Pressure Waveform–Based Cardiac Output Using the FloTrac/Vigileo: A Review and Meta-analysis
Jochen Mayer,Joachim Boldt,Reagan Poland,Amanda Peterson,Gerard R. Manecke
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2009; 23(3): 401
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
29 Cardiac index value measurement by invasive, semi-invasive and non invasive techniques: a prospective study in postoperative off pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients
Murali Chakravarthy,Subramanyam Rajeev,Vivek Jawali
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2009; 23(3): 175
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
30 Cardiac output monitoring.
de Waal, E.E.C. and Wappler, F. and Buhre, W.F.
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2009; 22(1): 71-77
[Pubmed]
31 Cardiac index value measurement by invasive, semi-invasive and non invasive techniques: a prospective study in postoperative off pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients
Chakravarthy, M. and Rajeev, S. and Jawali, V.
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2009; 23(3): 175-180
[Pubmed]
32 Cardiac output monitoring
Eric EC de Waal,Frank Wappler,Wolfgang F Buhre
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2009; 22(1): 71
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
33 Journal List> Korean J Anesthesiol> v. 54 (3); Mar 2008
Kang, S.J. and Choi, K.T. and Lee, J.H. and Lee, D.H.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2008; 54(3): 300-306
[Pubmed]
34 Cardiac output monitoring
Mathews, L. and Singh, KR
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2008; 11(1): 56
[Pubmed]
35 Early goal-directed therapy in moderate to high-risk cardiac surgery patients
Kapoor, PM and Kakani, M. and Chowdhury, U. and Choudhury, M. and Lakshmy, R. and Kiran, U. and Downloaded, PDF
Ann Card Anaesth. 2008; 11: 27-34
[Pubmed]
36 Problems in Cardiac Output Measurement and Clinical Understanding
Wonsik Ahn
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2008; 54(3): 241
[VIEW] | [DOI]
37 The Effects of Vasodilation on Cardiac Output Measured by PiCCO
Yamashita, K., Nishiyama, T., Yokoyama, T., Abe, H., Manabe, M.
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2008; 22(5): 688-692
[Pubmed]
38 The severity of positional mitral regurgitation during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
Ozay, B., Sargin, M., Abay, G., Ketenci, B., Kut, S., Enc, Y., Orhan, G., (...), Demirtas, M.
Heart Surgery Forum. 2008; 11(3): 130-136
[Pubmed]
39 The Effects of Vasodilation on Cardiac Output Measured by PiCCO
Koichi Yamashita,Tomoki Nishiyama,Takeshi Yokoyama,Hidehiro Abe,Masanobu Manabe
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2008; 22(5): 688
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
40 Cardiac output--have we found theægold standardæ?
Chakravarthy, M.
Annals of cardiac anaesthesia. ; 11(1): 1
[Pubmed]



 

Top